Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAET v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1 MIGRATION – application for declaration that applicant unlawfully detained and order for release from immigration detention – where alleged that no real likelihood of removal of applicant from Australia in foreseeable future – application dismissed. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5, 14, 194, 195, 196, 198 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) ss 39B(1), 39B(1A)(c)
Al Masri v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2002) 192 ALR 609 not followed NAES v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 2 applied NAET v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS NO. N 1254 OF 2002 BEAUMONT J 7 JANUARY 2003 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1254 OF 2002
BETWEEN: NAET
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: BEAUMONT J
DATE OF ORDER: 7 JANUARY 2003
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed, with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1254 OF 2002
BETWEEN: NAET
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: BEAUMONT J
DATE: 7 JANUARY 2003
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
BEAUMONT J:
Introduction 1 This matter was heard at the same time, and raises, in principle, the same questions as in NAES v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 2, in which I have also given reasons for judgment today and which should be read in conjunction with these reasons. Here also, the applicant seeks, pursuant to ss 39B(1) and 39B(1A)(c) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), a final declaration that he is detained without lawful authority under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), and a permanent order for his release from immigration detention. 2 By his statement of claim dated 25 November 2002, the applicant makes allegations to the following effect: · The applicant, a stateless Bidoon of Kuwait, arrived in Australia in July 1998 without a visa and was then taken into, and remains in, immigration detention. · In July 1998, he applied for, but was later refused, a protection visa. Subsequent attempts to review that refusal have failed. · On several occasions in 2002, he made requests to officers of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs ("the Department") to remove him to Kuwait, including a request in writing made on 30 September 2002 that the Department either remove or release him within 45 days. · On or about 1 October 2002, he was given "a one-way Australian travel document called an Australian Certificate of Identity and was advised by [the Department] to use the document[] to obtain a visa to go to Syria". · In late October 2002, the Syrian Embassy in Australia refused to issue him with a visa. · The Minister has not been able to secure the applicant's removal from Australia.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate