Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Signature Security Group Pty Limited [2003] FCA 3
TRADE PRACTICES – misleading and deceptive conduct by oral representations and advertisements in print and on radio – alleged misrepresentation as to price of goods in manner of stating the component of the price attributable to the goods and services tax (GST) - ACCC claim for declarations, injunctions and other relief including corrective advertising - purpose of corrective advertising to protect the public interest rather than to punish - whether any current misapprehension resulting from misleading advertising – appropriate test to determine breach of undertakings pursuant to s 87B of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 52, 53, 53C, 87B A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (Cth) Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (1996) ATPR 41-519 followed Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Dell Computer Pty Limited [2002] FCAFC 434 followed Brown v Jam Factory Pty Ltd (1981) 53 FLR 340 cited Taco Company of Australia Inc v Taco Bell Pty Limited (1982) 42 ALR 177 cited Equity Access Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1989) 16 IPR 431 cited St Luke's Health Insurance v Medical Benefits Fund of Australia Ltd (1995) ATPR 41-428 cited Minister for Health and Aged Care v Harrington Associates Ltd [2000] FCA 1723 cited Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Proprietary Limited v Puxu Proprietary Limited (1982) 149 CLR 191 followed Campomar Sociedad, Limitada v Nike International Limited (2000) 202 CLR 45 followed George Weston Foods Ltd v Goodman Fielder Ltd (2001) 49 IPR 553 cited Accounting Systems 2000 (Developments) Limited v CCH Australia Limited (1993) ATPR 41-269 cited Trade Practices Commission v Autoways Pty Limited (1990) ATPR 41–051 cited Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v On Clinic Aust Pty Ltd, Men Only Medical Clinic Pty Ltd & Potent-C Clinics (1996) 35 IPR 635 followed Janssen Pharmaceutical Pty Ltd v Pfizer Pty Ltd (1986) ATPR 40-654 cited Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Black and Decker (Australasia) Pty Ltd (1990) 12 ATPR 41-030 cited Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Hungry Jack's Pty Ltd [1996] FCA 955 cited Trade Practices Commission v Optus Communications Pty Ltd (1996) 34 IPR 176 followed AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION & CONSUMER COMMISSION v SIGNATURE SECURITY GROUP PTY LIMITED N 194 OF 2001 STONE J 13 JANUARY 2003 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate