Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
D'Arrigo v Carter, in the matter of Gartner Wines Pty Ltd
and the Corporations Act 2001 [2003] FCA 5
CORPORATIONS LAW – Examinations under ss 596 and 597 of the Corporations Act 2001 – Improper Purpose – information which may be obtained in examination – whether information can be used in third party litigation – whether possibility of such use sufficient to establish an improper purpose – same solicitor acting both for Receiver and for party in third party litigation – whether conflicting duties of solicitor sufficient to establish improper purpose AFFIDAVITS – Whether affidavit must be sworn before someone who is independent of deponent.
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Pt 5.9 Div 1 Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth) s 45 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 186 Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 Ainsworth v Hanrahan (1991) 25 NSWLR 155 cited Bienke v Minister for Primary Industry (1996) 135 ALR 128 cited Bourke v Davis (1889) 44 Ch D 110 cited El-Kalza v Thompson (1991) ANZ Conv R 11 cited In re Gregg; In re Prance (1869) LR 9 Eq 137 cited Re Cirillo; Ex parte Commissioner of Taxation (1992) 36 FCR 279cited Re Southern Equities Corporation Ltd (in liq); Bond & Anor v England (1997) 25 ACSR 394 Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Plowman (1995) 183 CLR 10 cited Johns v Australian Securities Commission (1993) 178 CLR 408 cited Harman v Secretary of State for Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280 cited Ainsworth v Hanrahan (1991) 25 NSWLR 155 at 168 cited Chapmans Ltd v Australian Stock Exchange [2002] FCA 666(unreported decision of Tamberlin J delivered 25 August, 1995) cited Moage Ltd (in liq) v Jagelman (2002) 43 ACSR 173 cited Sentry Corp v Peat Marwick Mitchell & Co (1990) 95 ALR 11 cited Re Addstone Pty Ltd (in liq); Ex p Macks (1998) 30 ASCR 162 cited Walton v Gardner (1993) 177 CLR 378 cited Carindale Country Club Estate Pty Ltd v Astill (1993) 115 ALR 112 cited Re Excel ;Worthley v England (1994) 52 FCR 69 cited New Zealand Steel (Australia) Ltd v Burton (1994) 13 ACSR 610 cited Bienke v Minister for Primary Industry (1996) 135 ALR 128 cited Gerah Imports Pty Ltd v The Duke Group (1993) 61 SASR 557 cited A Apps, "Rules on Affidavits" (1992) 66 ALJ 163
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate