Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Commissioner of Taxation v Pratt Holdings Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 6 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for access pursuant to s 263 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) – solicitor-client privilege – where corporate-client sought legal advice concerning taxation consequences of losses incurred by an entity within corporate-client's group – where, upon the recommendation of its solicitors, corporate-client engaged accounting firm to value losses and report upon transactions relevant to losses – where corporate-client refused access and claimed that documents were subject to legal professional privilege – certain documents prepared by solicitors – certain documents prepared by accounting firm – whether documents protected by privilege – dominant purpose test – whether accounting firm an agent of corporate-client for the purposes of advice privilege – whether corporate-client waived privilege in respect of documents produced by its solicitors when it provided them to the accounting firm – whether voluntary disclosure by corporate-client inconsistent with the maintenance of confidentiality Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), s 263 The Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission [2002] HCA 49 referred Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1999) 201 CLR 49 applied Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52 discussed R v Special Commissioner, Ex parte Morgan Grenfell & Co Ltd [2002] 3 All ER 1 referred Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) v Citibank Ltd (1989) 20 FCR 403 applied Grant v Downs (1976) 135 CLR 674 discussed Waugh v British Railways Board [1980] AC 521 discussed Mitsubishi Electric Australia Pty Ltd v Victorian WorkCover Authority (2002) 4 VR 332 referred Great Atlantic Insurance Co v Home Insurance Co [1981] 2 All ER 485 referred Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance of New Zealand Ltd v Stuart [1985] 1 NZLR 596 discussed Wheeler v Le Marchant (1881) 17 ChD 675 discussed Jones v Great Central Railway Company [1910] AC 4 referred Trade Practices Commission v Sterling (1979) 36 FLR 244 referred Morlea Professional Services Pty Ltd v South British Insurance Co Ltd (27 September 1984, Federal Court of Australia, unreported) discussed Nickmar Pty Ltd v Preservatrice Skandia Insurance Ltd (1985) 3 NSWLR 44 discussed Leader Westernport Printing Pty Ltd v IPD Instant & Duplicating Pty Ltd (1988) 5 ANZ Ins Cas 60-856 discussed Macedonia Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1987) 87 ATC 4,565 discussed Galway v Constable [2002] 2 Qd R 146 distinguished Australian Rugby Union Ltd v Hospitality Group Pty Ltd (1999) 165 ALR 253 discussed Re Highgrade Traders Ltd [1984] BCLC 151 discussed Price Waterhouse (a firm) v BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg) SA [1992] BCLC 583 discussed Mudgway v New Zealand Insurance Co Ltd [1988] 2 NZLR 283 discussed C-C Bottlers Ltd v Lion Nathan Ltd [1993] 2 NZLR 445 discussed United States v Kovel 296 F 2d 918 (1961) discussed United States v Schwimmer 892 F 2d 237 (2nd Cir. 1989) referred Grand Jury Proceedings (under seal) v United States 947 F 2d 1188 (4th Cir. 1991) referred Susan Hosiery Limited v Minister of National Revenue [1969] 2 Ex C.R. 27 discussed Lyell v Kennedy (No 2) (1883) 9 AC 81 referred Re Sokolov (1968) 70 D.L.R. (2d) 324 referred Belgravia Investments Ltd v Canada [2002] FCJ No 870 discussed Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 applied
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate