Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy, in the matter of Ebner [2003] FCA 73
BANKRUPTCY – trustee in bankruptcy – supervision by the Court – s 178 Bankruptcy Act – whether available for personal injury
PERSONAL PROPERTY –proof of ownership – inferred from possession – inferred from ownership of land on which property is found TORT – personal property – conversion – assertion of ownership – failure to return TRUSTS AND TRUSTEES – property purchased by wife using husband's credit card – inference of resulting trusts – whether rebutted by the presumption of advancement – whether presumption available in case of jointly enjoyed chattels Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 54(1), 58, 130(2), 149 and 178
Abesbaum, In re; Irving Trust Co. v Abesbaum 70 F2d 628 (2d Cir 1934) referred to Abrahams v Trustee of the property of Abrahams [2000] WTLR 593 cited Armory v Delamire (1721) 93 ER 664 referred to Bishop, Re; National Provincial Bank Ltd v Bishop [1965] 1 Ch 450disapproved Blair v Curran (1939) 62 CLR 464 applied Claflin & Co v The Continental Jersey Works 11 SE 721 (1890) cited Clark, Re (A Bankrupt), Ex parte The Trustee v Texaco Ltd [1975] 1 WLR 559 followed Cohen In re, deceased; National Provincial Bank Ltd v Katz [1953] 1 Ch 88 cited Dingle, Re; Westpac Banking Corporation v Worrell (1993) 47 FCR 478 referred to Dyer v Dyer (1788) 30 ER 42 cited Ebrand v Dancer (1630) 2 ChCas 26 cited First National Bank of Rodgers v Tribble 244 FW33 (1922) cited Fogarty, In the Marriage of (1976) 27 FLR 257 cited Hall, Re (1957) 20 ABC 21 referred to Houghton; Ex parte (1810) 17 VesJr 253 cited Howard E Perry & Co Ltd v British Railway Board [1980] 1 WLR 1375 followed James; Ex parte (1874) 9 Ch App 609 applied Jeffries v Great Western Railway (1856) 119 ER 680 referred to Johnson v Pickering [1907] 2 KB 437 cited Jones v Maynard [1951] 1 Ch 572 distinguished Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Co (Mance J, 29 July 1998, Queens Bench Division, unreported) followed Macchia v Nilant (2001) 110 FCR 101 applied Oakley v Lyster [1931] 1 KB 148 followed Peters, Re; ex parte Lloyd (1882) 47 LT 64 referred to Pickard v Pickard (1981) 7 Family Law Reports 636 cited Rathwell v Rathwell [1978] 2 SCR 436 cited Reid, Re; Clarke v Reid (1998) 85 FCR 452 cited Rider v Kidder (1805) 10 VesJr 630 cited Sheppard v Cartwright [1955] AC 431 cited Short v The City Bank (1912) 12 SR (NSW) 186 followed Silver v Silver [1958] 1 WLR 259 considered Smith v Torr (1862) 3 F&F 505 doubted South Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman [1896] 2 QB 44 followed Tyndall, Re; (1977) 30 FLR 6 referred to Winkfield, The [1902] P 42 referred to Crossley Vaines on Personal Property 5th ed (1973) Palmer & McKendrick (eds) Interests in Goods 2nd(1998) IN THE MATTER OF MAXWELL WILLIAM EBNER INGRID EBNER v THE OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY (AS TRUSTEE OF THE PROPERTY OF MAXWELL WILLIAM EBNER) VG 7179 of 1999
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate