Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Logue v Hansen Technologies Ltd [2003] FCA 81 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – security for costs – Federal Court Rules O 28 r 3 – whether applicant "ordinarily resident outside Australia" – discretionary considerations – relevance of applicant's lack of assets in jurisdiction – alternative claim made under s 56 of Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – principles governing exercise of discretion – factors to be taken into account – relevance of applicant's recent receipt of large payment into overseas account – relevance of applicant's lack of assets in jurisdiction – applicant's tenuous links with Australia – whether order for security for costs justified
WORDS AND PHRASES – "ordinarily resident outside Australia"
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 51(1) Federal Court Rules, O 28 r 3
Bell Wholesale Co Ltd v Gates Export Corporation (1984) 2 FCR 1 at 3-4 referred to Chapman v Luminis Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 496 at [12] referred to FFE Minerals Australia Pty Ltd v Mining Australia Pty Ltd (2000) 22 WAR 241 referred to Barton v Minister for Foreign Affairs (1984) 2 FCR 463 referred to Kent Heating Ltd v Cook-On Gas Products Pty Ltd (1984) 59 ALR 277 at 279 referred to Energy Drilling Inc v Petroz NL (1989) ATPR 40-954 at 50,422 referred to Levene v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1928] AC 217 at 232 considered Inland Revenue Commissioners v Lysaght [1928] AC 234 considered R v Barnet London Borough Council, Ex parte Nilish Shah [1983] 2 AC 309 considered Parkinson v Myer Wolff and Manly (unreported, 23 April 1985) referred to Leyvand v Barash (unreported, Chancery Division, 15 February 2000) referred to Re Erskine (1893-4) 10 TLR 32 referred to Re Brauch (A Debtor), Ex parte Britannic Securities & Investments Ltd [1978] Ch 316 referred to Re Mackenzie [1941] Ch 69 referred to Hopkins v Hopkins [1950] 2 All ER 1035 referred to Appah v Monsen [1967] 1 WLR 893 referred to R v Barnet London Borough Council, ex parte Nilish Shah [1981] 2 WLR 86 referred to Cicutti v Suffolk County Council [1980] 3 All ER 689 referred to Lord v Colvin (1859) 4 Drew. 366 at 376 cited P S Chellaram & Co Ltd v China Ocean Shipping Co (1991) 102 ALR 321 at 323 considered Farmitalia Carlo Erba SRL v Delta West Pty Ltd (1994) 28 IPR 336 referred to Equity Access Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1989) ATPR 40-972 considered Pegasus Gold Inc v Bateman Project Engineering [1999] FCA 1734 at [18] referred to Amalgamated Mining Services Pty Ltd v Warman International Ltd (1988) 19 FCR 324 referred to Fletcher v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1992) 110 ALR 233 at 238 referred to Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 referred to DARREN JOHN LOGUE v HANSEN TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED (ACN 090 996 455) and HANSEN CORPORATION ASIA LIMITED V569 of 2002 WEINBERG J 17 FEBRUARY 2003 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate