Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NABQ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 130 MIGRATION – protection visa – application for judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal – no appearance by the applicant. Federal Court Rules, O 32 r 2(1)(c) NABQ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N 1037 OF 2002 HILL J 6 FEBRUARY 2003 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1037 OF 2003
BETWEEN: NABQ
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: HILL J
DATE OF ORDER: 6 FEBRUARY 2003
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent Minister's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1037 OF 2003
BETWEEN: NABQ
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: HILL J
DATE: 6 FEBRUARY 2003
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 Before me is an application for judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal affirming a decision of a delegate of the respondent Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs refusing the applicant a protection visa. When the matter was called for trial, the applicant was absent. Counsel for the respondent Minister has asked the court to make an order under O 32 r 2(1)(c) of the Federal Court Rules that the proceedings be dismissed. 2 I note that in the proceedings of review before the Tribunal the applicant also did not attend, although he had been notified, as is required, that the Tribunal was unable on the papers to make a decision in his favour. In the circumstances, I think it is appropriate to make the order requested, and accordingly I would dismiss the application and order the applicant to pay the respondent Minister's costs of it. I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Hill.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate