Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Applicant NAHF of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 140 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – application for protection visa refused by Refugee Review Tribunal – appellants invited to attend oral hearing – appellant husband sought adjournment of hearing on the basis of appellant wife's illness – hearing adjourned to a date when appellant wife was still incapacitated – whether requirements of s 425 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) were complied with – whether there was a breach of the rules of natural justice in relation to the appellants
Constitution (Cth) s 75(v) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 25(1A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 425, 425A, 425(1), 426A, 426A(1), 426, 427, 428, 476(2)(a), 474, 474(2) Migration Legislation Amendment Act (No 1) 1998 (Cth) Migration Legislation Amendment (Procedural Fairness) Act 2002 (Cth) Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Capitly [1999] FCA 193 considered Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Mohammad [2000] FCA 1275 followed Xiao v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1472 followed Sreeram v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 53 followed De Silva v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2000) 98 FCR 364 applied Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82 cited Zhang v Minister for Immigration, Local Government & Ethnic Affairs (1993) 45 FCR 384 cited Chen v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1994) 48 FCR 591 cited R v Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Commission; Ex parte The Angliss Group (1969) 122 CLR 546 considered Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1964-1965) 113 CLR 475 considered Mazhar v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1759 followed NAAV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 228 cited SCAZ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1377 considered S157/2002 v The Commonwealth of Australia [2003] HCA 2 Applicant WAFV of 2002 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2003] FCA 16 APPLICANT NAHF OF 2002 AND ORS v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N 982 OF 2002 HELY J 5 MARCH 2003 PERTH (BY VIDEO LINK) (HEARD IN SYDNEY)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate