Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Quall v Native Title Registrar [2003] FCA 145 NATIVE TITLE – review of decision of delegate of Native Title Registrar – decision not to accept an application for registration under ss 190A, 190B, 190C Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – delegate found native title claim group in application not complete native title claim group – nature of information delegate entitled to consider – nature of review of delegate's decision under s 190D considered. Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), ss 61-64, ss 190A-190C, s 251B Native Title Amendment Act 1998 (Cth) Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 (Cth) Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1976 (Cth) Risk v National Native Title Tribunal and Quall [2000] FCA 1589 – followed The Queen v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; Ex parte Hardiman (1980) 144 CLR 13 – cited Risk v Native Title Registrar [2001] FCA 1120 - followed Borkovic v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1981) 39 ALR 186 – cited Hamblin v Duffy (1981) 34 ALR 333 – cited Western Australia v Strickland (2000) 99 FCR 33; [2000] FCA 652 – followed Powder v Registrar, Native Title Tribunal [1999] FCA 913 - cited Strickland v Native Title Registrar (1999) 168 ALR 242; [1999] FCA 1530 – cited Quall v Risk [2001] FCA 378 – cited Daniel v State of Western Australia [2002] FCA 1147 – cited Martin v Native Title Registrar [2001] FCA 16 – cited Western Australia v Ward (2002) 191 ALR 1 – cited The Queen v Commonwealth Conciliation & Arbitration Commission; Ex parte The Angliss Group (1969) 122 CLR 546 – cited Ewert v Lonie [1972] VR 308 – cited Shire of Swan Hill v Bradbury (1936) 56 CLR 746 – cited KEVIN (TIBBY) QUALL v NATIVE TITLE REGISTRAR D 10 of 2002 MANSFIELD J 7 MARCH 2003 DARWIN
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NORTHERN TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY D 10 OF 2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate