Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wilkes v State of Western Australia [2003] FCA 156 NATIVE TITLE – PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – claim to restrict evidence.
RICHARD WILKES AND ALBERT CORUNNA ON BEHALF OF THE DARBARLYUNG NYOONGARS OF THE DERBAL YERRIGAN AND THE SWAN RIVER PLAINS, ROBERT CHARLES BROPHO ON BEHALF OF THE SWAN VALLEY NYUNGAH COMMUNITY, WILLIAM WARRELL ON BEHALF OF THE WARRELL FAMILY, GREGORY LAWRENCE GARLETT AND KELVIN PATRICK GARLETT ON BEHALF OF THE GARLETT FAMILY AND CORRIE CHRISTOPHER BODNEY ON BEHALF OF THE BODNEY FAMILY BALLARUKS V STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA AND ORS NO. WAG 142 OF 1998 NO. WAG 141 OF 1998 NO. WAG 137 OF 1998 NO. WAG 138 OF 1998 NO. WAG 139 OF 1998 NO. WAG 140 OF 1998 NO. WAG 149 OF 1998 NO. WAG 143 OF 1998 NO. WAG 6128 OF 1998 NO. WAG 6159 OF 1998 NO. WAG 6239 OF 1998 NO. WAG 6283 OF 1998 BEAUMONT J 5 MARCH 2003 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WAG 142 OF 1998 WAG 141 OF 1998 WAG 137 OF 1998 WAG 138 OF 1998 WAG 139 OF 1998 WAG 140 OF 1998
WAG 149 OF 1998 WAG 143 OF 1998 WAG 6128 OF 1998 WAG 6159 OF 1998 WAG 6239 OF 1998
WAG 6283 OF 1998
BETWEEN: RICHARD WILKES AND ALBERT CORUNNA ON BEHALF OF THE DARBARLYUNG NYOONGARS OF THE DERBAL YERRIGAN AND THE SWAN RIVER PLAINS
FIRST COMBINED APPLICANTS
ROBERT CHARLES BROPHO ON BEHALF OF THE SWAN VALLEY NYUNGAH COMMUNITY
SECOND COMBINED APPLICANTS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate