Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant NAIK of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 161 MIGRATION – application for extension of time in which to appeal from decision of Federal Magistrates Court, dismissing application for review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal affirming refusal of protection visa – complaints about illogicality of reasoning in grappling with factual matters – held not to constitute error of law or jurisdictional error Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Epeabaka (1999) 84 FCR 411 followed Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Perera (2001) 183 ALR 204 followed Avesta v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 121 followed W26 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 90 followed
APPLICANT NAIK OF 2002 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N 1326 OF 2002 LINDGREN J 28 FEBRUARY 2003 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1326 OF 2002
BETWEEN: APPLICANT NAIK OF 2002
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: LINDGREN J
DATE OF ORDER: 28 FEBRUARY 2003
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application for an extension of time in which to file a notice of appeal be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1326 OF 2002
BETWEEN: APPLICANT NAIK OF 2002
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: LINDGREN J
DATE: 28 FEBRUARY 2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate