Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NACB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 165
MIGRATION – application for judicial review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal – Tribunal's finding of recent invention of particular claims – jurisdictional error – jurisdictional unreasonableness – whether evidence "all one way" – whether "probative material or logical grounds" present – whether Tribunal bound to accept applicant's uncontradicted explanation of failure to make particular claim prior to oral hearing before Tribunal Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 195 ALR 24 cited BC v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 67 ALD 60 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611 distinguished Gamaethige v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 109 FCR 424 cited Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Durairajasingham (2000) 74 ALJR 405 cited NACB & ANOR v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N 1071 OF 2002 LINDGREN J 7 MARCH 2003 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1071 OF 2002
BETWEEN: NACB
FIRST APPLICANT
NACC
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: LINDGREN J
DATE OF ORDER: 7 MARCH 2003
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicants pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1071 OF 2002
BETWEEN: NACB
FIRST APPLICANT
NACC
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate