Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SCAN v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 168 MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Magistrates Court – whether there was a failure by Refugee Review Tribunal to extend procedural fairness to a visa applicant – adverse credibility finding – finding that a document produced by the visa applicant was fabricated – whether letter from Refugee Review Tribunal gave notice to the visa applicant that the genuineness of the document was under question – whether the letter was positively misleading by suggesting otherwise – whether jurisdictional error – whether s 474 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) applied. Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 474, 424A NAAV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 228; (2002) 193 ALR 449 referred to Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia [2003] HCA 2 applied Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Epeabaka (1999) 160 ALR 543 cited Re Refugee Review Tribunal; ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82 cited Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Miah (2001) 179 ALR 238 cited Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte "A" (2001) 185 ALR 489 distinguished Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Lam [2003] HCA 6 cited SCAN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS S 180 of 2002 von DOUSSA J ADELAIDE 11 MARCH 2003
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 180 OF 2002
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SCAN
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: von DOUSSA J
DATE OF ORDER: 11 MARCH 2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate