Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SGLB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 176 MIGRATION ACT – Application for protection visa – powers of Federal Court on judicial review – Migration Act s 474 – finding of psychiatric condition – in the absence of any expert evidence – use of finding in relation to credit – failure to consider whether proceeding should continue – whether jurisdictional error Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S134/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia[2003] HCA 1 Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia[2003] HCA 2 Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte AALA (2000) 204 CLR 82 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Eastman v The Queen (2000) 203 CLR 1
SGLB v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS No S 6 OF 2003 SELWAY J ADELAIDE 11 MARCH 2003
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 6 OF 2003
BETWEEN: SGLB
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: SELWAY J
DATE OF ORDER: 11 MARCH 2003
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The order of the Tribunal dated 13 August 2001 is quashed. 2. Remit the matter to the Refugee Review Tribunal for further consideration. 3. The Applicant have his costs of the appeal and his application for judicial review (if any).
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 6 OF 2003
BETWEEN: SGLB
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate