Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NADP v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 185 NADP v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N 1171 of 2002 MOORE J SYDNEY 13 MARCH 2003
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1171 OF 2002
BETWEEN: NADP
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MOORE J
DATE OF ORDER: 13 MARCH 2003
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application is dismissed with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1171 OF 2002
BETWEEN: NADP
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MOORE J
DATE: 13 MARCH 2003
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction 1 This is an application for judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal ("the Tribunal") of 18 September 2002 handed down 15 October 2002, affirming a decision of a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs ("the Minister") refusing to grant the applicant a protection visa. The criterion for the grant of such a visa is, subject to subd AL Div 3 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ("the Act"), is that the applicant is a person to whom Australia has protection obligations under the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees of 28 July 1951 as amended by the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees of 31 January 1967 ("the Convention"). 2 The applicant, formerly a resident of Bangladesh, arrived in Australia on 4 July 2000. On 31 July 2000 he lodged an application with the Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs for a protection visa under the Act. On 31 August 2000 the delegate refused to grant the protection visa, and on 30 September 2000 the applicant applied to the Tribunal for review of that decision.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate