Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Chaste Corporation Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 195 COSTS – whether an order for costs of a motion that is dismissed can be taxed immediately
Federal Court Rules, O 62 r 3, r 7
AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v CHASTE CORPORATION PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 089 837 329) and OTHERS No Q 252 of 2001 SPENDER J BRISBANE 12 MARCH 2003
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 252 OF 2001
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION
APPLICANT
AND: CHASTE CORPORATION PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 089 837 329)
FIRST RESPONDENT
BRADDON RALPH WEBB
SECOND RESPONDENT
ORLAWOOD PTY LTD (ACN 059 294 334)
THIRD RESPONDENT
PETER CLARENCE FOSTER
FOURTH RESPONDENT
JILLIAN LOUISE FOSTER
FIFTH RESPONDENT
SEAN PETRIE ALLEN COUSINS
SIXTH RESPONDENT
CONSTANTINE XENOUDAKIS
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
KEVIN ANTHONY MCMULLAN
EIGHTH RESPONDENT
ALAN KENNETH COOPER
NINTH RESPONDENT
STEPHEN D'ALTON
TENTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: SPENDER J
DATE OF ORDER: 12 MARCH 2003
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: (1) The application for interlocutory relief sought in the notice of motion filed 29 January 2003 be dismissed. (2) The respondent to the motion have his costs of and incidental to it, to be taxed if not agreed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 252 OF 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate