Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Jackson v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 225 MIGRATION – review of decision of Migration Review Tribunal – refusal of Family (Residence) (Class A0) visa - special need relative provisions– whether Tribunal asked wrong question – whether Tribunal misapplied policy – whether Tribunal applied wrong test Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 29, 30, 31, 31(3), 474, 474(1), 476, 499, 499(2), 499(2A) Migration Regulations 1.03, 1.15, Sch 1 item 1115, item 1115(4), cl 806, cl 806.21, cl 806.22. cl 806.213 Jun v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 867 considered Plaintiff S157 of 2002 v Commonwealth [2003] HCA 2 applied R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox & Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598 referred to Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 applied Ratumaiwai v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 311 referred to KEITH PETER JACKSON v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & indigenous Affairs w92 of 2002 rd NICHOLSON J 21 MARCH 2003 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W92 OF 2002
BETWEEN: Keith Peter Jackson
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: RD NICHOLSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 21 MARCH 2003
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application for review be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W92 OF 2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate