Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union v Skilled Engineering Ltd [2003] FCA 260 INDUSTRIAL LAW – certified agreement – principles of construction – circumstances in which term should be implied – whether casual award rates superseded by new rates in certified agreement Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth), ss 170LY, 170LZ, 178
Ali v Christian Salvesen Food Services Ltd [1997] 1 All ER 721 distinguished Aron Salomon (Pauper) v A Salomon and Company Limited [1897] AC 22 referred to Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Australia (1998) 82 FCR 175 cited BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Limited v President, Councillors and Ratepayers of the Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266 applied Byrne v Australian Airlines Limited (1995) 185 CLR 410 cited Chorlton v Lings (1868) LR 4 CP 374 referred to Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Henry Walker Eltin Contracting Pty Ltd (2001) 108 IR 409 distinguished Dinch v Dinch [1987] 1 WLR 252 considered Geo A Bond & Co Ltd (In Liquidation) v McKenzie [1929] AR (NSW) 498 referred to Glover v Glover (1964) 6 FLR 262 referred to Hawkins v Clayton (1988) 164 CLR 539 cited Hawkins v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1996) 66 IR 322; AMASCU (1998) 82 FCR 175 cited Hospital Products Limited v United States Surgical Corporation (1984) 156 CLR 41 cited Kainhofer v Director of Public Prosecutions (No.2) (1996) 70 FCR 184 referred to Prenn v Simmonds [1971] 1 WLR 1381 applied Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd (2001) 185 ALR 335 followed Seamen's Union of Australia v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd (1976) 46 FCR 444 cited Short v FW Hercus Pty Ltd (1993) 40 FCR 511, 520 referred to St Edmundsbury and Ipswich Diocesan Board of Finance v Clark (No. 2) [1975] 1 WLR 468 applied Warramunda Village Inc v Pryde (2001) 105 FCR 437 distinguished AUTOMOTIVE, FOOD, METALS, ENGINEERING, PRINTING AND KINDRED INDUSTRIES UNION v SKILLED ENGINEERING LIMITED V 1139 of 2001 FINKELSTEIN J 27 MARCH 2003 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate