Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lean v Tumut River Orchard Management Ltd [2003] FCA 269
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether application should be dismissed or statement of claim should be struck out as failing to disclose any cause of action – whether pleading defective – whether reasonably arguable that a claim for damages based on misleading or deceptive conduct gives rise to an equitable set-off in respect of moneys owing under contract – whether reasonably arguable that an assignee of such contractual entitlements takes its rights subject to such equitable set-off – applicant's claims reasonably arguable, but part of statement of claim struck out with leave to re-plead – alternative application to transfer proceedings to the New South Wales Registry of the Federal Court – relevant factors – proceedings retained in Western Australia for time being.
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 52, 82, 87 National Mutual Holdings Pty Ltd v The Sentry Corporation (1988) 19 FCR 155 applied Phillip Morris Inc v Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd (1981) 148 CLR 457 applied Fencott v Muller (1983) 152 CLR 570 applied Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally (1999) 198 CLR 511 applied Tomlinson v Cut Price Deli Pty Ltd (1992) 38 FCR 490 referred to Ferro Corporation (Aust) Pty Ltd v International Pools Pty Ltd (1993) 30 NSWLR 539 referred to Re Kleiss; Ex parte Kleiss v Capt'n Snooze Pty Ltd (1996) 61 FCR 436 referred to AWA Ltd v Exicom Australia Pty Ltd (1990) 19 NSWLR 705 referred to AMP Society v Specialist Funding Consultants Pty Ltd (1991) 24 NSWLR 326 referred to Murphy v Zamonex Pty Ltd (1993) 31 NSWLR 439 referred to Doherty v Murphy [1996] 2 VR 553 referred to Ghirardi v Allregal Corp Pty Ltd [2001] WASCA 366 referred to Oraka Pty Ltd v Leda Holdings Ltd (1997) ATPR 41-558 referred to Krambousanos v Jedda Investments Pty Ltd [1996] FCA 144 referred to Young v Kitchin (1878) 3 Ex D 127 referred to Sun Candies Pty Ltd v Polites [1939] VLR 132 referred to Government of Newfoundland v Newfoundland Railway Co [1888] 13 App Cas 199 referred to Lawrence v Hayes [1927] 2 KB 111 referred to Jedda Investments Pty Ltd v Krambousanos (1997) 72 FCR 138 referred to Southern Textile Converters Pty Ltd v Stehar Knitting Mills Pty Ltd [1979] 1 NSWLR 692 referred to Mitchell v Purnell Motors Pty Ltd [1961] NSWR 165 referred to General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 applied
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate