Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Temwell Pty Ltd v DKGR Holdings Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 345 COURTS AND JUDGES – apprehended bias – association between judge and a solicitor who may be called as a witness Fried v National Australia Bank Ltd [2000] FCA 787 - cited Aussie Airlines Pty Ltd v Australian Airlines Pty Ltd (1996) 65 FCR 215 - cited Bienstein v Bienstein (2003) 195 ALR 225 - cited Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 - cited TEMWELL PTY LTD v DKGR HOLDINGS PTY LTD (formerly known as DYNAMIC DATA SYSTEMS PTY LTD) (ACN 062 778 616) (in liquidation), mCOM SOLUTIONS INC, DRAGON VENTURES.COM INC, mCOM SOLUTIONS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 091 375 950) (in liquidation), DAVID HAINS, ROBERT VAN ZANTEN, DRAGONVENTURES.COM LIMITED, RICHARD CHARLES HAINS, IAN KIEFEL V 663 OF 2000 MERKEL J 17 APRIL 2003 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V663 OF 2000
BETWEEN: TEMWELL PTY LTD (ACN 082 656 157)
APPLICANT
AND: DKGR HOLDINGS PTY LTD (formerly known as DYNAMIC DATA SYSTEMS PTY LTD) (ACN 062 778 616) (in liquidation)
FIRST RESPONDENT
mCOM SOLUTIONS INC.
SECOND RESPONDENT
DRAGON VENTURES.COM INC
THIRD RESPONDENT
mCOM SOLUTIONS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 091 375 950) (in liquidation)
FOURTH RESPONDENT
DAVID HAINS
FIFTH RESPONDENT
ROBERT VAN ZANTEN
SIXTH RESPONDENT
DRAGONVENTURES.COM LIMITED
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate