NAAQ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 357
Federal Court of Australia
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAAQ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 357
MIGRATION – Appeal from Federal Magistrate – no appearance by appellant – appeal dismissed
NAAQ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
N 139 of 2003
TAMBERLIN J
SYDNEY
17 APRIL 2003
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 139 OF 2003
BETWEEN: NAAQ
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 17 APRIL 2003
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. The appellant pay the respondent's costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 139 OF 2003
BETWEEN: NAAQ
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE: 17 APRIL 2003
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1 In this matter I am satisfied from the evidence which has been given and also from the communication to the Court which has been repeated in Court today, that this is a case where the appellant was aware of the hearing today and did not wish to attend the Court. I note that the appellant is in detention. In these circumstances I consider the appropriate order is that the application should be dismissed and the appellant should pay the costs of the respondents.
2 Accordingly, on the ground of failure to appear on the hearing of the appeal which has been listed, notified and of which the appellant was aware, I dismiss the appeal with costs.
I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Tamberlin
Associate:
Dated: 16 May 2003
No appearance by the Appellant.
Counsel for the Respondent: T Reilly
Solicitor for the Respondent: Blake Dawson Waldron
Date of Hearing: 17 April 2003
Date of Judgment: 17 April 2003
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.