Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
DSE (Holdings) Pty Limited v Intertan Inc [2003] FCA 384
EVIDENCE – practice – legal professional privilege – alleged implied waiver by pleading in a defence – extent of operation of any relevant waiver Telstra Corporation Ltd v BT Australasia Pty Ltd (1998) 85 FCR 152 considered Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 considered and applied Perpetual Trustees (WA) Ltd v Equuscorp Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 925 (Full Court) considered Fort Dodge Australia Pty Ltd v Nature Vet Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 501 considered BP Australia Pty Limited v Nyran Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 1302 (per Nicholson J) referred to Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 201 CLR 49 applied Northern Territory v GPAO (1999) 196 CLR 553 applied Lillicrap v Nalder & Son [1993] 1 WLR 94 considered Nederlandse Reassurantie Groep Holding NV v Bacon & Woodrow [1995] 1 All ER 976 considered Kershaw v Whelan [1996] 1 WLR 358 considered The Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2002) 192 ALR 561 applied Paragon Finance Plc v Freshfields [1999] 1 WLR 1183 considered Hayes v Dowding [1996] PNLR 578 referred to Thomason v The Council of the Municipality of Campbelltown (1939) 39 SR (NSW) 347 considered Mathisen v Wallarah Coal Co Ltd (1937) 37 SR 530 considered In re Coomber [1911] 1 Ch. 723 referred to Inche Noriah v Shaik Allie Bin Omar [1929] A.C. 127 referred to Barilla v James (1964) 81 WN (Pt 1) (NSW) 457 considered United States Surgical Corp v Hospital Products International Pty Limited (McLelland J unreported 11 October 1981, Equity Division No 2094/81) considered Standard Chartered Bank of Australia Ltd v Antico (1993) 36 NSWLR 87 considered Attorney General (NT) v Maurice (1986) 161 CLR 475 referred to Ampolex Limited v Perpetual Trustee Co (Canberra) Limited (1995) 37 NSWLR 405 considered Benecke v National Australia Bank (1993) 35 NSWLR 110 referred to Torcasio Developments Pty Ltd v Country Park Developments Pty Ltd (Byrne J Supreme Court of Victoria, 9 September 1991) referred to Bayliss v Cassidy (No 2) [2000] 1 Qd R 464 considered Hongkong Bank of Australia Ltd v Murphy [1993] 2 VR 419 referred to Farrow Mortgage Services Pty Ltd v Webb 39 (1996) NSWLR 601 referred to Southern Equities Corporation Ltd (In Liq) v Arthur Andersen & Co (1997) 70 SASR 166 referred to Data Access Corporation v Powerflex Services Pty Ltd [1994] AIPC 91-112 not followed Wardrope v Dunne [1996] 1 Qd R 224 not followed Liquorland (Australia) Pty Ltd v Anghie [2003] VSC 73 referred to Goldberg v Ng (1995) 185 CLR 83 referred to Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd v Spalvins (1998) 81 FCR 360 considered Akins v Abigroup Ltd (1998) 43 NSWLR 539 referred to Esso Australia Resources Limited v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1998) 83 FCR 511 referred to Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Kamisha Corp Ltd (1999) ATPR 41-697 considered John Tanner Holdings Pty Ltd v Mortgage Management Ltd (2001) 182 ALR 201 referred to Pickering v Edmunds (1994) 63 SASR 357 at 362 referred to Randell v Rockliff (1999) 9 Tas R 85 referred to Wayne Lawrence Pty Ltd v Hunt [1999] NSWSC 1044 referred to Garratt's Ltd v Thanga Thangathurai [2002] NSWSC 39 referred to United Rural Enterprises v Lopmand [2002] NSWSC 1142 referred to BP Australia Ltd v Stallwood [2000] WASC 75 disapproved Ideas Plus Investments Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd [2002] WASC 167 disapproved South Australian Government Financing Authority v Bank of New Zealand (No 2) [2002] SASC 10 referred to Gough v Gilmour Holdings Pty Ltd v Caterpillar of Australia (No 1) [2001] NSW IRComm 147 referred to Mathieson v Booth [2000] VSC 89 referred to Henderson v McCafferty [2002] 1 Qd R 170 referred to Woodside Petroleum Development Pty Ltd v H & R E & W Pty Ltd, (Anderson J unrep 3 October 1997 WASC) referred to Western Australia v Southern Equities Corporation Ltd (1996) 69 FCR 245 referred to Commonwealth of Australia v Temwood Holdings Pty Ltd [2002] WASC 107 at [10] considered Cross on Evidence, Butterworths, Sydney, 2000 pars [25010] – [25020] Mathieson and Page "Implied Waiver of Privilege" (2000) NZLJ 355 DSE (HOLDINGS) PTY LIMITED v INTERTAN INC (AND ANOR) N 3011 of 2002 ALLSOP J 30 APRIL 2003 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate