Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant M88/2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 427 MIGRATION – whether the Refugee Review Tribunal erred in its consideration of whether the applicant had a well founded fear of persecution – error of logic – whether the Refugee Review Tribunal failed to comply with s424A – denial of procedural fairness Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s424A Gamaethige v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 109 FCR 424, applied VGAO of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 68, cited SAAP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 577, followed VDAU v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 363, followed VAAC v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 74, applied APPLICANT M88/2002 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS V688 OF 2002 MARSHALL J MELBOURNE 30 APRIL 2003
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V688 OF 2002
BETWEEN: APPLICANT M88/2002
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MARSHALL J
DATE OF ORDER: 30 APRIL 2003
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed.
2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs, including reserved costs, to be taxed in default of agreement. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V688 OF 2002
BETWEEN: APPLICANT M88/2002
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate