Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant VEAL of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 437
MIGRATION – application for protection visa – Refugee Review Tribunal disavowed reliance on "dob-in letter" – whether letter contained "non-disclosable information" – whether the "dob-in letter" contained confidential information – whether the Tribunal failed to accord procedural fairness to the applicant by determining the application without disclosing to the applicant the information contained in the letter – whether a failure to disclose information that is not required to be disclosed under s 424A, or is prohibited from being published or disclosed under s 440, can constitute a failure to accord procedural fairness
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5, 424A, 438 and 440
Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 195 ALR 24 – applied NAAP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 76 – cited Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82 – cited Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex Parte Miah (2001) 206 CLR 57 – cited VAAC v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 74 – applied Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 – considered Youssef v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1987) 14 ALD 550 – cited Roderick v Australian and Overseas Telecommunications Corporation Ltd (1992) 39 FCR 134 – cited NIB Health Funds Ltd v Private Health Insurance Administration Council (2002) 115 FCR 561 – applied Chu v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 78 FCR 314 – cited Pilbara Aboriginal Land Council Aboriginal Corporation Inc v Minister for Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Affairs (2000) 103 FCR 539 – considered R v Gaming Board for Great Britain; Ex parte Benaim and Khaida [1970] 2 QB 417 – applied Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs v Kurtovic (1990) 21 FCR 193 – cited Chu Sing Wun v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1993) 45 FCR 540 – cited Gilson v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (unreported, Federal Court of Australia, Lehane J, BC9703148, 21 July 1997) – considered WAFG v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 93 – cited Li v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1527 – cited Whiting & Byrne v Collector of Customs (Vic) (1987) 14 FCR 434 – cited Boucher v Australian Securities Commission (1996) 71 FCR 122 – cited Corrs Pavey Whiting & Byrne v Collector of Customs (Vic) (1987) 14 FCR 434 – cited Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 151 CLR 288 – cited Johns v Australian Securities Commission (1993) 178 CLR 408 – cited Re Pochi and Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 2 ALD 33 – cited Dart Industries Inc v David Bryar and Associates Pty Ltd (1997) 38 IPR 389 – cited Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26 – cited APPLICANT VEAL OF 2002 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS V 405 OF 2002 MERKEL J 9 MAY 2003 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate