Dudzinski v Harris [2003] FCA 440

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Dudzinski v Harris [2003] FCA 440 SOCIAL SECURITY – where entered Newstart Allowance Activity Agreement – where referred for intensive assistance – where rescind from agreement – where error in employment record – whether satisfied activity test – whether acted in bad faith or dishonestly – whether adequate notice – whether agreement misrepresented – whether Newstart Activity Agreement is agreement for purposes of Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) – whether entitled to Newstart Allowance – whether entitled to Newstart Allowance whilst case is reviewed – where did not seek review in Administrative Appeals Tribunal. Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) ss 23, 593, 596, 596A, 597, 598, 601, 601(1), 601(5), 604, 604(1B), 604(1C), 605(2), 605(3), 606, 606(1), 607, 1242A Social Security (Administration) Act 1999 (Cth) s 196

Project Blue Sky Inc & Ors v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 applied WALDEMAR DUDZINSKI AND ANNA DUDZINSKI v BRIAN HARRIS, STEVE UHLMANN, S M ROSSINGTON AND DAVID ROSALKY Q 61 OF 2001 DOWSETT J 13 MAY 2003 BRISBANE

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 61 OF 2001

BETWEEN: WALDEMAR DUDZINSKI

FIRST APPLICANT

ANNA DUDZINSKI

SECOND APPLICANT

AND: BRIAN HARRIS

FIRST RESPONDENT

STEVE UHLMANN

SECOND RESPONDENT

S M ROSSINGTON

THIRD RESPONDENT

DAVID ROSALKY

FOURTH RESPONDENT

JUDGE: DOWSETT J

DATE OF ORDER: 13 MAY 2003

WHERE MADE: BRISBANE

THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The second applicant pay the respondents' costs of the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.