Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Shephard v Chiquita Brands (South Pacific) Ltd [2003] FCA 464 DEREK GEORGE SHEPHARD V CHIQUITA BRANDS (SOUTH PACIFIC) LIMITED N698 of 2002
MADGWICK J 4 FEBRUARY 2003 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N698 of 2002
BETWEEN: DEREK GEORGE SHEPHARD
APPLICANT
AND: CHIQUITA BRANDS (SOUTH PACIFIC) LIMITED
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MADGWICK J
DATE OF ORDER: 4 FEBRUARY 2003
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal is upheld and the order of the learned Federal Magistrate set aside. 2. The costs of the proceedings before Raphael FM be paid by the respondent and in default of agreement, costs are to be taxed by the Registrar of the Federal Magistrates Court. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N698 of 2002
BETWEEN: DEREK GEORGE SHEPHARD
APPLICANT
AND: CHIQUITA BRANDS (SOUTH PACIFIC) LIMITED
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MADGWICK J
DATE: 4 FEBRUARY 2003
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT (revised from transcript) HIS HONOUR: 1 As to the appeal on costs, the appeal is upheld and the order of the learned Federal Magistrate set aside. I order that the costs of the proceedings before Raphael FM be paid by the respondent and in default of agreement, costs are to be taxed by the Registrar of the Federal Magistrates Court. I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Madgwick.
Associate: Dated: 28 May 2003 Appellant appeared in person. Counsel for the Respondent: Mr C R Newlinds and Mr H Stowe Date of Hearing: 4 February 2003 Date of Judgment: 4 February 2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate