Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
United Firefighters' Union of Australia v Metropolitan Fire and Emergency Services Board [2003] FCA 480 INDUSTRIAL – interlocutory injunctions sought to restrain hearing of charges against members of the United Firefighters' Union of Australia – disciplinary charges laid for breach of s 78B of the Metropolitan Fire Brigades Act 1958 (Cth) – refusal to obey lawful order to remove "scab" appellation – use of work email system to circulate emails unrelated to duties as an officer – assault on fellow firefighter – whether serious questions to be tried – whether breach of a term of a certified agreement – whether certified agreement could also constitute a common law agreement – requirements of a common law agreement not met – whether laying and hearing of charges contravened s 298K(1) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) – whether "prohibited reason" for purposes of s 298L(1)(l) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) – whether breach of s 298K(1) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) could constitute a conspiracy to harm by unlawful means. Metropolitan Fire Brigades Act 1958 (Vic): s 78B Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth): ss 298K(1), 298L(1)(l) Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy, Union v Gordonstone Coal Management Pty Ltd (1997) 78 FCR 437, referred to Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union v G&K O'Connor Pty Ltd (2000) 104 FCR 80, referred to Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Industrial Relations Commission (2000) 203 CLR 645, considered Ryan v Textile Clothing and Footwear Union of Australia [1996] 2 VR 235, considered Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd v Australian Workers' Union [2001] FCA 1600, considered ACTEW Corporation Limited v Pangallo [2002] FCAFC 325, considered Australian Meat Industry Employees' Union v Frugalis Pty Ltd (1989) 30 IR 149, referred to Community and Public Sector Union v Telstra Corporation Limited (2001) 107 FCR 93, applied Finance Sector Union of Australia v Australian & New Zealand Banking Group Limited (2002) 114 IR 352, applied Major v State of South Australia [1999] FCA 1684, distinguished Heidt v Chrysler Australia Limited (1976) 26 FLR 257, referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate