Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cakmak v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2003] FCA 503
MIGRATION – partner visa – relationship between applicant and sponsoring spouse had ceased – task of Migration Review Tribunal to determine whether applicant had suffered domestic violence committed by sponsoring spouse – mode of proof of domestic violence – statutory declarations of competent persons – whether open to tribunal to disregard statutory declarations because source of information on which they were based was applicant – whether open to tribunal to determine whether statutory declarations established conduct sufficiently serious on part of sponsoring spouse to amount to domestic violence – single episode of physical violence – reliance by competent persons on threats and verbal abuse by sponsoring spouse and members of her family – manner of dealing with mechanical modes of proof
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) regs 1.15A, 1.21, 1.22, 1.23, 1.24, 1.26, item 100.221, Sch 2 Du v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1115 referred to Meroka v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 482 followed FIKRI CAKMAK v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS V 1173 of 2001 GRAY J 22 MAY 2003 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 1173 of 2001
BETWEEN: FIKRI CAKMAK
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: GRAY J
DATE OF ORDER: 22 MAY 2003
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the proceeding. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate