Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ross Palmer Holdings v Commissioner of Taxation [2003] FCA 508
TAXATION – transfer of losses within company group – determination by Commissioner to disallow deductions - application for extension of time to transfer losses – exercise of discretion ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – decision of Commissioner to refuse application for extension of time to transfer losses – whether error of law in decision not to grant extensions of time
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1967 (Cth) s 5, s 16 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ss 80G, 160ZP, 160ZD, 160ZH Johnson v Commissioner of Taxation (1986) 11 FCR 351 cited Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd & Ors v Minister for Home Affairs & Environment (1985-86) 58 ALR 305 referred to Brown v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 99 ATC 4516 applied Zizza v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 99 ATC 4711 cited Elias v Commissioner of Taxation [2002] FCA 845 cited Comcare v A'Hearn (1993) 119 ALR 85 approved Asiamet No 1 Resources Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2003] FCA 35 approved House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 referred to ROSS PALMER HOLDINGS PTY LTD v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION and TUBE SECURITIES PTY LTD v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION No Q 282 of 2001 No Q 283 of 2001 SPENDER J BRISBANE 23 MAY 2003
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 282 OF 2001
BETWEEN: ROSS PALMER HOLDINGS PTY LTD
APPLICANT
AND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
RESPONDENT
AND BETWEEN: TUBE SECURITIES PTY LTD Q 283 OF 2001
APPLICANT
AND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: SPENDER J
DATE OF ORDER: 23 MAY 2003
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. In each proceeding, the decisions of the respondent refusing an extension of time be set aside. 2. The applications for an extension of time be remitted to the respondent for further consideration in accordance with law. 3. The respondent is to pay the applicants' costs of the applications, to be taxed if not agreed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate