Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Reinsurance Australia Corporation Limited v HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd (in liquidation) [2003] FCA 526 Reinsurance Australia Corporation Limited (ACN 061 215 601) & Monegasque De Reassurances S.A.M. v HIH Casualty and General Insurance (In Liquidation) (ACN 47 008 482 291), AIG Europe (UK) Ltd and New Hampshire INSURANCE Company, Heath Group Limited (formerly CE Health plc), Heath Insurance Broking Ltd formerly CE Heath (Insurance Broking) Ltd and Heath North America and Special Risks Ltd, Ice Media Limited and Premier Media Limited & J P Morgan Chase Bank (formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank, formerly known as Chemical Securities Inc) N 827 of 2002 JACOBSON J 30 MAY 2003 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 827 of 2002
BETWEEN: Reinsurance Australia Corporation Limited ACN 061 215 601
FIRST APPLICANT
Monegasque De Reassurances S.A.M.
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: HIH Casualty and General Insurance (In Liquidation) ACN 47 008 482 291
FIRST RESPONDENT
AIG EUROPE (UK) LTD and NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
SECOND RESPONDENTS
HEATH GROUP LIMITED (formerly CE HEATH plc), HEATH INSURANCE BROKING LTD formerly C.E. HEATH (INSURANCE BROKING) LTD and HEATH NORTH AMERICA AND SPECIAL RISKS LTD
THIRD RESPONDENTS
ICE MEDIA LIMITED and PREMIER MEDIA LIMITED
FOURTH RESPONDENTS
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK (formerly known as THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, formerly known as CHEMICAL SECURITIES INC)
FIFTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: JACOBSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 30 MAY 2003
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. That the second, third and fifth respondents pay 75% of the applicants' costs of the preparation and hearing of the motions filed on 23 September 2002, 21 November 2002 and 10 September 2002 respectively. 1. The costs payable under the order are to exclude any costs incurred in the preparation of the statements of Mr KL Walwin and Ms CJ Hamilton exhibited to the affidavit of Mr TR Price sworn 6 November 2002. 3. The costs of preparation of those statements are to be costs in the cause. 1. The first respondent's costs of the motion filed on 29 November 2002 are to be the first respondent's costs in the cause. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate