Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sochorova v Department of Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 585 MIGRATION – family residence visa – remaining relative – application for review of decision of Migration Review Tribunal – whether the Tribunal erred in construction of the statutory definition of 'near relative' – whether the Tribunal failed to consider whether the applicant satisfied the criteria of an 'aged dependent relative'. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – whether the Tribunal failed to take evidence into account. WORDS AND PHRASES – 'near relative' – 'aged dependent relative'.
Statutes Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 474 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 1.15
Cases Azzi v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2002) 195 ALR 166 Approved Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 195 ALR 24 Applied Videto v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1985) 8 FCR 167Approved TERZA SOCHOROVA v DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS Q8 of 2002 KIEFEL J 13 JUNE 2003 BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q8 OF 2002
BETWEEN: TERZA SOCHOROVA
APPLICANT
AND: DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: KIEFEL J
DATE OF ORDER: 13 JUNE 2003
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The decision of the Migration Review Tribunal of 21 August 2001 be set aside and the matter remitted to the Tribunal, differently constituted, for determination according to law. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q8 OF 2002
BETWEEN: TERZA SOCHOROVA
APPLICANT
AND: DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate