Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Jones v Daytrader HQ Ltd [2003] FCA 586
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – motion to strike out pleading – no point of principle
GLEN JONES and WINTEROAK PTY LTD v DAYTRADER HQ LTD, ROSS SMITH, CRAIG READHEAD, PETER MOLONEY and CHRISTOPHER TATE
S3007 of 2001
CARR J
13 JUNE 2003
PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S3007 OF 2001
BETWEEN: GLEN JONES
First Applicant
WINTEROAK PTY LTD (ACN 070 526 144)
Second Applicant
AND: DAYTRADER HQ LTD (ACN 086 972 429)
First Respondent
ROSS SMITH
Second Respondent
CRAIG READHEAD
Third Respondent
PETER MOLONEY
Fourth Respondent
CHRISTOPHER TATE
Fifth Respondent
JUDGE: CARR J
DATE OF ORDER: 13 JUNE 2003
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The respondents' motion, notice of which was filed on 5 March 2003, be dismissed. 2. The respondents pay the applicants' costs of the motion. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S3007 OF 2001
BETWEEN: GLEN JONES
First Applicant
WINTEROAK PTY LTD (ACN 070 526 144)
Second Applicant
AND: DAYTRADER HQ LTD (ACN 086 972 429)
First Respondent
ROSS SMITH
Second Respondent
CRAIG READHEAD
Third Respondent
PETER MOLONEY
Fourth Respondent
CHRISTOPHER TATE
Fifth Respondent
JUDGE: CARR J
DATE: 13 JUNE 2003
PLACE: PERTH
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
introduction 1 This is a motion on notice by the respondents to strike out numerous paragraphs of the further amended statement of claim. The facts which are pleaded in that document are, in summary, as follows. 2 The first applicant ("Mr Jones") was employed by the first respondent ("Daytrader") as its sales manager for South Australia between 9 November 1999 and 17 October 2001. The second applicant ("Winteroak") is a company owned and controlled by a Mr Stephen Dinnes ("Mr Dinnes"). Mr Dinnes was employed by Daytrader as sales executive for Western Australia between about 1 March 1999 and 5 October 2001. Daytrader was incorporated in Western Australia. This case is concerned with shares in its capital which were issued at or about the time the company was initially listed on the Australian Stock Exchange ("the ASX"). 3 The second respondent ("Mr Smith") was at all material times chief executive officer and an executive director of Daytrader. The third respondent ("Mr Readhead") was at all material times a director and the non-executive chairman of Daytrader. The fourth and fifth respondents ("Mr Moloney" and "Mr Tate") were at all material times directors of Daytrader. Mr Tate was also the managing director of Daytrader. 4 In paragraphs 10-18 of the statement of claim the applicants plead a series of statements which (at the end of paragraph 18) they say are thereafter together referred to as "the Daytrader Representations". They were said to be as follows:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate