Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
King v AG Australia Holdings Limited [2003] FCA 652 SHANE ROBERT KING v AG AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS LIMITED AND ORS N 955 of 1999 ALLSOP J 24 JUNE 2003 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 955 of 1999
BETWEEN: SHANE ROBERT KING
APPLICANT
AND: AG AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS LIMITED (ACN 054 573 401)
FIRST RESPONDENT
GRANT SAMUEL & ASSOCIATES PTY LIMITED (ACN 050 036 372)
SECOND RESPONDENT
DAVID MORTIMER
THIRD RESPONDENT
BRUCE HOGAN
FOURTH RESPONDENT
STEWART HONER STEFFEY
FIFTH RESPONDENT
RONALD ASHTON
SIXTH RESPONDENT
MARINA DARLING
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
ANDREW KALDOR
EIGHT RESPONDENT
LLOYD LANGE
NINTH RESPONDENT
DAVID O'HALLORAN
TENTH RESPONDENT
IAN POLLARD
ELEVENTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: ALLSOP J
DATE OF ORDER: 24 JUNE 2003
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. the application for leave to appeal be dismissed. 2. the application for a stay of his Honour's orders be dismissed. 3. the third to eleventh respondents pay the applicant's costs of the motions. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 955 of 1999
BETWEEN: SHANE ROBERT KING
APPLICANT
AND: AG AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS LIMITED (ACN 054 573 401)
FIRST RESPONDENT
GRANT SAMUEL & ASSOCIATES PTY LIMITED (ACN 050 036 372)
SECOND RESPONDENT
DAVID MORTIMER
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate