Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Te, in the matter of an application for writs of Habeas Corpus, Prohibition & Mandamus against Ruddock [2003] FCA 661
MIGRATION – deportation of non-citizen – detention of applicant pending deportation – lawfulness of detention – delay in executing deportation order – effect of lapse of time – whether implied limit on length of detention – whether lapse of time shows detention to be for ulterior purpose – whether lapse of time shows purpose of effecting deportation cannot be carried out – relevance of proceedings taken by deportee to challenge deportation order – failure of deportee to provide information relevant to obtaining travel document Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 206, 253 Meng Kok Te v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs [1998] FCA 1339, cited Meng Kok Te v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs [1999] FCA 111, cited Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Te [2002] HCA 48 (2002) 193 ALR 37, cited Koon Wing Lau v Calwell (1949) 80 CLR 534, applied Park Oh Ho v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1989) 167 CLR 637, applied Vo v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 803 (2000) 98 FCR 371, followed Perez v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1342 (1999) 94 FCR 287, referred to Luu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 369 (2002) 197 ALR 433, followed Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for Immigration, Local Government & Ethnic Affairs (1992) 176 CLR 1, referred to Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Al Masri [2003] FCAFC 70 (2003) 197 ALR 241, discussed Perez v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 450, referred to R v Governor of Durham Prison; Ex parte Hardial Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704, referred to Tan Te Lam v Superintendent of Tai A Chau Detention Centre [1997] AC 97, referred to R (Saadi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] UK HL 41 [2002] 4 All ER 785, referred to R (I) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 888, referred to Zadvydas v Davis 533 US 678 (2001), referred to Cabal v Secretary, Department of Justice (Victoria) [2000] FCA 1227, applied Cabal v United Mexican States (No 6) [2000] FCA 651 (2000) 174 ALR 747, followed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate