Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Travel Compensation Fund v Internova Travel Pty Limited (in liquidation) & Ors [2003] FCA 664 TRAVEL COMPENSATION FUND v INTERNOVA TRAVEL PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) [ACN 098 220 065] & ORS N 1392 OF 2002 BENNETT J 2 JULY 2003 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1392 OF 2002
BETWEEN: TRAVEL COMPENSATION FUND
APPLICANT
AND: INTERNOVA TRAVEL PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) [ACN 098 220 065]
FIRST RESPONDENT
JOHN JOSEPH FOLEY
SECOND RESPONDENT
OWEN COUGHLAN
THIRD RESPONDENT
MARK NEWHAM
FOURTH RESPONDENT
ANTHONY CHARLES DE GOVRIC
FIFTH RESPONDENT
DAVID JOHN MYERS
SIXTH RESPONDENT
PAUL LUKE MYERS
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
ANTHONY HENRY SERRA
EIGHTH RESPONDENT
NICHOLAS MUMBY
NINTH RESPONDENT JUDGE: BENNETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 2 JULY 2003
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Paragraphs 109 to 117 of the draft amended statement of claim are struck out as against the third, fourth and ninth respondents. 2. Leave be granted to the applicant to replead those parts of the pleadings that have been struck out.
Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1392 OF 2002
BETWEEN: TRAVEL COMPENSATION FUND
APPLICANT
AND: INTERNOVA TRAVEL PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) [ACN 098 220 065]
FIRST RESPONDENT
JOHN JOSEPH FOLEY
SECOND RESPONDENT
OWEN COUGHLAN
THIRD RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate