Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Raymond Joseph Dibb v Commissioner of Taxation [2003] FCA 673 TAXATION – appeal from objection decision on review of Private Ruling of Commissioner of Taxation – termination of employment – payment on settlement of litigation in Federal Court – whether an eligible termination payment (ETP) – whether in part consideration for personal injury or bona fide redundancy WORDS AND PHRASES – "eligible termination payment" – "bona fide redundancy" – "consideration for personal injury"
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ss 27A(1), 27A(19), 27CB(1)(b)(ii), 27F Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) s 14ZZ
Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Scully (2000) 201 CLR 148 - applied Graham v Robinson [1992] VR 279 - cited Le Grand v Commissioner of Taxation (2002) 195 ALR 194 – applied McIntosh v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1979) 25 ALR 557 – cited McLaurin v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1960-1961) 184 CLR 391 - applied Reseck v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1975) 133 CLR 45 - cited RAYMOND JOSEPH DIBB v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION Q42 of 2003 HEEREY J 8 JULY 2003 MELBOURNE (HEARD IN BRISBANE)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q42 OF 2003
BETWEEN: RAYMOND JOSEPH DIBB
APPLICANT
AND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: HEEREY J
DATE OF ORDER: 8 JULY 2003
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE (HEARD IN BRISBANE)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. The objection decision is affirmed.
3. The applicant pay the respondent's costs, including reserved costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q42 OF 2003
BETWEEN: RAYMOND JOSEPH DIBB
APPLICANT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate