Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Communications, Electrical Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union, Communications Division, in the matter of an Inquiry Relating to an Election for Offices [2003] FCA 739 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY LLOYD HARRIS FOR AN INQUIRY RELATING TO AN ELECTION FOR OFFICES IN THE COMMUNICATIONS, ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONIC, ENERGY, INFORMATION, POSTAL, PLUMBING AND ALLIED SERVICES UNION OF AUSTRALIA, COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION V358 OF 2003 MARSHALL J 22 JULY 2003 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V358 OF 2003
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY LLOYD HARRIS FOR AN INQUIRY RELATING TO AN ELECTION FOR OFFICES IN THE COMMUNICATIONS, ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONIC, ENERGY, INFORMATION, POSTAL, PLUMBING AND ALLIED SERVICES UNION OF AUSTRALIA, COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
JUDGE: MARSHALL J
DATE OF ORDER: 22 JULY 2003
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: The inquiry be terminated.
THE COURT CERTIFIES THAT:
The applicant acted reasonably in applying for the inquiry. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V358 OF 2003
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY LLOYD HARRIS FOR AN INQUIRY RELATING TO AN ELECTION FOR OFFICES IN THE COMMUNICATIONS, ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONIC, ENERGY, INFORMATION, POSTAL, PLUMBING AND ALLIED SERVICES UNION OF AUSTRALIA, COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
JUDGE: MARSHALL J
DATE: 22 JULY 2003
PLACE: MELBOURNE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 These reasons for judgment should be read together with the reasons for judgment in CEPU v Harris [2003] FCA 737, which was published immediately before the publication of these reasons. 2 The Court would have found that irregularities had occurred with respect to the election, the subject of the inquiry, but for the making of the validation orders in CEPU v Harris. Consequently it is appropriate, in the absence of any other alleged irregularity not cured by the validation orders, to order that the inquiry be terminated. It is also appropriate to certify that the applicant acted reasonably in applying for the inquiry. I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Marshall.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate