Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hicks v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2003] FCA 757
MIGRATION – judicial review – New Zealand citizen – cancellation of visa – cancellation by Minister personally – whether Minister bound to have regard to unavailability of review by Administrative Appeals Tribunal in deciding to determine case personally - failure to pass character test – substantial criminal record – reliance upon protected material – irrelevance to existence of substantial criminal record – whether question of judicial power raised – what constitutes substantial criminal record whether applicant sentenced to two or more terms of imprisonment totalling two years or more – concurrent sentences – effective term ten months – nominal total of sentences twenty five months - whether concurrent terms counted in total for purposes of character test – concurrent terms not counted – counting of concurrent terms constituting jurisdictional error – jurisdiction of court to grant relief - applicant returned to New Zealand – utility of relief – certiorari and prohibition issued
JUDGES AND COURTS – single judge decisions – judicial comity – decision of single judge of same or coordinate jurisdiction to be followed unless clearly wrong – authority of and confidence in courts – desirability of referral of important points of difference to Full Court
CRIMINAL LAW - sentencing – concurrent sentences – common law principle – statutory presumption – underlying principles
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 32(2)(a), s 5, s 501(2), (6), (7), s 503A(2), (3), (6), s 474
Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B
Plaintiff S157/2002 v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 195 ALR 24 cited
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 187 ALR 117 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate