Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lal, in the matter of an application for writs of prohibition and certiorari against the Honourable Philip Ruddock [2003] FCA 859 MIGRATION – application for writs of prohibition and certiorari – notice of motion to dismiss application as no reasonable basis for application disclosed – application for certiorari out of time – whether delay was occasioned by special circumstances – reason for delay was that one of the applicants was undertaking a course in Australia and the applicants were awaiting the outcome of their request to the Minister to exercise his discretion under s 351 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether an extension of time should be granted pursuant to O 60 r 6 of the High Court Rules – whether any reasonable basis for application disclosed.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) High Court Rules: Order 55 r 17(1), O 60 r 6 Federal Court Rules: O 20 r 2
Gallo v Dawson (1990) 93 ALR 479, referred to Re Commonwealth of Australia; Ex parte Marks (2000) 177 ALR 491, applied Applicant A2 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 576, applied Re Batuwantudawa [2003] FCA 684, applied RAJEND LAL & MOHINI LATA LAL v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS & ORS V 435 of 2003 GOLDBERG J 13 AUGUST 2003 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 435 of 2003
BETWEEN: RAJEND LAL and MOHINI LATA LAL
Applicants
AND: HONOURABLE PHILIP RUDDOCK,
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
First Respondent
WENDY BODDISON
(sitting as the Migration Review Tribunal)
and
REGINA PERTON
(in her capacity as Senior Member of the Migration Review Tribunal)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate