Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Miyamoto (No 2) [2003] FCA 894
UNIVERSAL MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
(ACN 000 158 592) & ORS v JUN MIYAMOTO & ORS N 1331 OF 2002 LINDGREN J 21 AUGUST 2003 PERTH (VIA VIDEO LINK TO SYDNEY)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1331 OF 2002
BETWEEN: UNIVERSAL MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
(ACN 000 158 592)
FIRST APPLICANT
SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED
(ACN 000 033 581)
SECOND APPLICANT
WARNER MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED
(ACN 000 815 565)
THIRD APPLICANT
MURDER INC RECORDS
FOURTH APPLICANT
MCA RECORDS
FIFTH APPLICANT
UNIVERSAL RECORDS
SIXTH APPLICANT
SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT INC
SEVENTH APPLICANT
ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION
EIGHTH APPLICANT
ELECTRA RECORDS
NINTH APPLICANT
ISLAND DEF JAM MUSIC GROUP
TENTH APPLICANT
AND: JUN MIYAMOTO also known as DJ MOTO
FIRST RESPONDENT
DAVID PACHECO
SECOND RESPONDENT
PETER PAPALII
THIRD RESPONDENT
TAHI CROFT
FOURTH RESPONDENT
NICK GARCIA
FIFTH RESPONDENT
MINESTO PTY LIMITED (ACN 079 106 791)
trading as ANTHEM RECORDS
SIXTH RESPONDENT
UNSOUND RECORDS PTY LIMITED (ACN 002 677 456)
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
DANIEL MAXWELL NYAVOR
EIGHTH RESPONDENT
EDMOND NICHOLAS KALEEL trading as SOUL SENSE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate