Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Torpedoes Sportswear Pty Limited v Thorpedo Enterprises Pty Limited & Anor [2003] FCA 901
TRADE MARKS – appeal from decision of delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks pursuant to s 56 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – nature of an appeal from an opposition hearing before a delegate – whether appeal a full hearing of factual issues on the merits – nature of onus
TRADE MARKS – whether marks are substantially identical – whether marks are deceptively similar – 'reverse' confusion – aural similarity – visual similarity – idea conveyed by marks– imperfect recollection – proprietorship
WORDS AND PHRASES – 'substantially identical', 'deceptively similar'
Trade Marks Act 1955 (Cth) Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) Patents Act 1990 (Cth) Anheuser-Busch Inc v Budejovicky Budvar (2003) 56 IPR 182 Aristoc Ltd v Rysta Ltd (1944) 1B IPR 467 Australian Woollen Mills Ltd v FS Walton & Co Ltd (1937) 58 CLR 641 Berlei Hestia Industries Ltd v The Bali Company Inc (1973) 129 CLR 353 Blount Inc v Registrar of Trade Marks (1998) 40 IPR 498 C A Henschke & Co v Rosemount Estates Pty Ltd (2000) 52 IPR 42 Carnival Cruise Lines Inc v Sitmar Cruises Ltd (1994) 31 IPR 375 Chantelle v Kabushiki Kaisha Chandeal (1996) 36 IPR 563 Clark v Sharp [1898] 15 RPC 141 Cooper Engineering Co Pty Ltd v Sigmund Pumps Ltd (1952) 86 CLR 536 Companhia Souza Cruz Industria E Comercio v Rothmans of Pall Mall (Australia) Ltd (1998) 41 IPR 497 Eno v Dunn (1890) 1B IPR 391 Ex parte O'Sullivan; re Craig (1944) 44 SR (NSW) 291 F Hoffman la Roche v New England (2000) 99 FCR 56 Fina Research SA v Halliburton Energy Services Inc (2002) 121 FCR 94 Gardenia Overseas Pte Ltd v The Garden Co Ltd (1994) 29 IPR 485 In the Matter of an Application of William Bailey (Birmingham) Ltd to Register a Trade Mark and Opposition Thereto by AC Gilbert Co [1935] 52 RPC 136 Jafferjee v Scarlett (1937) 57 CLR 115 Johnson & Johnson v Kalnin (1993) 26 IPR 435 Lomas v Winton Shire Council (2003) AIPC 91-839 Mars GB Ltd v Cadbury Ltd [1987] RPC 387 MID Sydney Pty Ltd v Australian Tourism Company Ltd & Ors (1998) 90 FCR 236 Pacific Publications Pty Ltd v IPC Media Pty Ltd (2003) 57 IPR 28 Pianotist Company Ltd's Application (1906) 23 RPC 774 Pioneer Hi-Bred Corn Co v Hy-Line Chicks Pty Ltd [1979] RPC 410 Radio Corporation Pty Ltd v Disney (1937) 57 CLR 448 Re Bali Brassiere Co Inc's Registered Trade Mark and Berlei Limited's Application (1968) 118 CLR 128 Re London Lubricants (1920) Ltd's Application (1925) 42 RPC 264 Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths Ltd (1999) 93 FCR 365 Shell Co of Australia Limited v Esso Standard Oil (Australia) Limited (1963) 109 CLR 407 Southern Cross Refrigerating Co v Toowoomba Foundry Pty Ltd (1954) 91 CLR 592 Sporoptic Pouilloux SA v Arnet Optic Illusions Inc (1995) 32 IPR 430 Sports Café Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks (1999) 42 IPR 552 The Coca-Cola Company v All-Fect Distributors Ltd t/as Millers Distributing Company (1999) 47 IPR 481 The Kendall Co v Mulsyn Paint and Chemicals (1963) 109 CLR 300 The Shell Co of Australia Ltd v Rohm & Haas Co (1949) 78 CLR 601 Wingate Marketing Pty Ltd v Levi Strauss (1994) 49 FCR 89 Working Party to Review the Trade Marks Legislation, Recommended Changes to the Australian Trade Marks Legislation, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, July 1992 Macquarie Dictionary (revised third edition) TORPEDOES SPORTSWEAR PTY LIMITED (subject to deed of company arrangement) (ACN 072 597 114) V THORPEDO ENTERPRISES PTY LIMITED (ACN 082 077 110) & ANOR N 1327 OF 2002 BENNETT J 27 AUGUST 2003 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate