Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Nokia Corporation v Mai [2003] FCA 924 TRADE MARKS – infringement – "use … as a trade mark" - accessories or spare parts – whether the respondent had an arguable defence under s 122(1)(c) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – whether circumstances of importation gave rise to an infringement Practice and procedure – application for summary judgment – no arguable defence or triable issue Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) ss 120, 122(1)(c), 126, 131, 133 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) O 20 r 1 Geoffrey Inc & Ors v Luik & Anor (1997) 38 IPR 555 referred to Flocast Australia Pty Ltd v Purcell & Ors (1997) 39 IPR 177 referred to Caterpillar Inc & Anor v Sun Forward Pty Ltd (1996) 36 IPR 411 referred to Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 referred to General Steel Industries Inc. v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 referred to Johnson & Johnson Australia Pty Ltd v Sterling Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd (1991) 21 IPR 1 applied Shell Co of Australia Ltd v Esso Standard Oil (Australia) Ltd (1963) 109 CLR 407 applied Angove's Pty Ltd v Johnson (1982) 66 FLR 216 referred to Masson Seeley & Co Ld v Hill Bros (Service) Ld (1940) 57 RPC 128 referred to Minimax Ld v Moffat (1935) 52 RPC 340 followed Kodak Ld v London Steroscopic & Photographic Co Ld (1903) 20 RPC 337 referred to G H Gledhill & Sons Ld v British Perforated Toilet Paper Company (1911) 28 RPC 429 applied Neostyle Manufacturing Co Ld v Ellam's Duplicator Co (1904) 21 RPC 185 referred to Interlego AG & Anor v Croner Trading Pty Ltd (1992) 39 FCR 348 referred to Gillette Company & Anor v Pharma-Goods Australia Pty Ltd & Anor (1997) 38 IPR 509 referred to Sony Computer Entertainment Australia Pty Ltd v Saleh [2001] FCA 717 followed Dr Martens Australia Pty Ltd& Ors v Bata Shoe Company of Australia Pty Ltd & Ors [1997] FCA 505 referred to Colgate-Palmolive Company & Anor v Cussons Pty Limited (1993) 46 FCR 225 applied John S Hayes & Associates Pty Limited v Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Limited (1994) 52 FCR 201 referred to Re Wilcox; Ex parte Venture Industries Pty Ltd & Ors (No 2) (1996) 72 FCR 151 referred to Ruddock & Ors v Vadarlis & Ors (2002) 115 FCR 229 referred to Fancourt & Anor v Mercantile Credits Limited (1983) 154 CLR 87 referred to James Lahore, Patents, Trade Marks & Related Rights (Butterworths, Australia, 2001) NOKIA CORPORATION V TRUYEN MAI AND JIMMY MAI V517 of 2003 KENNY J 2 SEPTEMBER 2003 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate