Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Prentice v Cummins (No 6) [2003] FCA 1002 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – motion to separate causes of action the subject of earlier no case submissions from remaining causes of action – respondents had elected to call no evidence in relation to the causes of action subject to the no case submissions – applicants entitled to cross examine respondent on all issues relevant to proceedings, including the causes of action the subject of no case submissions BANKRUPTCY – application pursuant to s 121 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – quantum of Bankrupt's beneficial interest in matrimonial home registered in joint names – Bankrupt's wife contributed nearly two-thirds of purchase price - presumption of resulting trust rebutted – common intention to acquire property as joint beneficial owners –Trustees entitled to 50 per cent of net proceeds of sale BANKRUPTCY – whether Bankrupt was beneficially entitled to share held in his name – company acquired by the Bankrupt's wife to act as trustee of her family trust – wife paid for share and acquisition costs – presumption of resulting trust applies – Trustees' claim to share dismissed Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 120, 121 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), ss 11, 27, 26(a), 135(a), (b), 144 Family Law Act 1979 (Cth), s 79 Property (Relationships) Act 1984 (NSW), s 8 Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW) Prentice v Cummins (No 4) [2002] FCA 1215 cited Prentice v Cummins (No 5) (2002) 51 ATR 400 cited Brady v Stapleton (1952) 88 CLR 322 cited Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 applied Mayor and Corporation of Berwick-Upon-Tweed v Murray (1850) 19 LJ Ch 281 followed Morgan v Brydges (1818) 2 Stark 314; 171 ER 657 cited R v Chin (1985) 157 CLR 671 cited GPI Leisure Corp Ltd v Herdsman Investments Pty Ltd (No 3) (1990) 20 NSWLR 15 cited Re Woodfine; Thompson v Woodfine (1878) 47 LJ Ch 832 cited Calverley v Green (1984) 155 CLR 242 cited Bryson v Bryant (1992) 29 NSWLR 188 cited Muschinski v Dodds (1985) 160 CLR 583 cited Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137 cited Brown v Brown (1993) 31 NSWLR 582 cited Nelson v Nelson (1995) 184 CLR 538 cited Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Lopantinsky [2003] FCAFC 109 cited Pettitt v Pettitt [1970] AC 777 cited Shephard v Cartwright [1955] AC 431 cited Charles Marshall Pty Ltd v Grimsley (1956) 95 CLR 353 cited Doohan v Nelson [1973] 2 NSWLR 320 cited Vedejs v Public Trustee [1985] VR 569 cited Cattanach v Melchior (2003) 77 ALJR 1312 cited Commercial Union Assurance Company of Australia Ltd v Ferrcom Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 389 cited JD Heydon, Cross on Evidence (6th Aust ed, 2000) RM Stonham, The Law of Vendor and Purchaser (1964) MAXWELL WILLIAM PRENTICE & ANOR (together the Trustees of the property of John Daniel Cummins, a Bankrupt) v MARY ELIZABETH CUMMINS & ORS N 7481 of 2001 SACKVILLE J SYDNEY 24 SEPTEMBER 2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate