Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Truong v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1035
MIGRATION – judicial review – application for review of decision by Migration Review Tribunal – applicant claimed to be "special need relative" of nominator – criteria for visa to be considered both at time application made and at time of decision – Tribunal found that nominator not in need of permanent or long-term assistance at time of application – Tribunal also found that assistance could reasonably be obtained from another – finding of fact lacked cogency – no ground of judicial review made out
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 31(1), 65(1)(a) & (b)
Wu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 105 FCR 39 at 46 referred to Azzi v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2002) 120 FCR 48 at 90 referred to Jun v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 867 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Epeabaka (1998) 84 FCR 411 referred to Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 at 356 referred to NAMM of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 32 referred to Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Applicant S20/2002 (2003) 198 ALR 59 at 71, and 89-90 referred to
TAN THI PHUONG TRUONG and CONG MIN PHAN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
V433 of 2002
WEINBERG J
30 SEPTEMBER 2003
MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V443 OF 2002
BETWEEN: TAN THI PHUONG TRUONG
FIRST APPLICANT
CONG MIN PHAN
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate