Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicants M6/2002 v The Honourable Philip Ruddock, Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1071
MIGRATION – fear of persecution due to ethnicity – failure of Tribunal to take account of evidence of beating and interrogation in considering whether the applicants were persecuted – failure of Tribunal to apply the correct test – whether Tribunal unreasonable Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 417
Applicant M78/2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2003] FCA 726 followed Craig v The State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 referred to Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1986) 162 CLR 24 applied
Chan Yee Kin v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 referred to
Mok v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1993) 47 FCR 1 referred to
APPLICANTS M6/2002 v THE HONOURABLE PHILIP RUDDOCK MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS, MR JOHN VRACHNAS, AN OFFICER OF THE COMMONWEALTH, IN HIS CAPACITY AS A MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL and DR PETER NYGH, AN OFFICER OF THE COMMONWEALTH, IN HIS CAPACITY AS PRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL V148 OF 2003
MARSHALL J 7 OCTOBER 2003 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V148 OF 2003
ON REMITTAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA BETWEEN: APPLICANTS M6/2002
APPLICANTS
AND: THE HONOURABLE PHILIP RUDDOCK MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
MR JOHN VRACHNAS, an officer of the Commonwealth, in his capacity as a member of the Refugee Review Tribunal
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate