Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mashood v Commonwealth of Australia [2003] FCA 1147 MIGRATION – application by children born in Australia but not entitled to citizenship by virtue of s 10(2) Australian Citizenship Act 1948 (Cth) – expiration of visas of one child and her parents and pending expiry of visa of second child – challenge by unrelated party to the validity of s 10(2) Australian Citizenship Act 1948 (Cth) currently before the High Court – application for interlocutory relief on behalf of the children pending determination of matter before the High Court – whether serious issue to be tried evidenced by existing legal challenge – whether denial of liberty constitutes irreparable injury – application for interlocutory relief on behalf of the children's parents – no rights or entitlements would accrue to the parents as non‑citizens within Australia if children were found to be Australian citizens – whether Court can grant interlocutory relief to restrain detention and deportation of parents pursuant to the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – consideration of Court's parens patriae jurisdiction. Migration Act 1958 (Cth): ss 189, 198 Australian Citizenship Act 1948 (Cth): s 10(2) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth): s 23 Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia (1986) 161 CLR 148, applied Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parteTe(2002)193ALR37,referredto Preston v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 420, applied Richardson v Forestry Commission (1998) 164 CLR 261, referred to Jackson v Sterling Industries Ltd (1987) 162 CLR 612, applied Peniche v Vanstone (1999) 96 FCR 38, referred to Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (1998) 195 CLR 1, applied Tupou v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2001] FCA 225, considered Nevsky v Scott [2002] FamCA 860, considered Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273, considered Secretary, Department of Health and Community Services v JWB and SMB (1991) 175 CLR 218, referred to Wellesley v Wellesley [1828] 4 ER 1078, referred to MinisterforImmigrationandMulticultural Affairs vW157/00A[2002]FCAFC 281,referredto Tait v R (1962) 108 CLR 620, applied FATHIMA SHANEEZA MASHOOD and SHAN IFTHIKAR MASHOOD (Infants by their next friend GALAGAWA VIDANALAGE GEDARA IFTHIKAR AHMED MASHOOD) v COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA and MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS V 903 of 2003 GOLDBERG J 21 OCTOBER 2003 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate