Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Prentice v Cummins (No 7) [2003] FCA 1162 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – claim for interest pursuant to s 51A of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – appropriate rate of interest to apply COSTS – apportionment of costs liability between parties Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 121 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules (Cth), O 35 r 8 Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW), Sh J Namol Pty Ltd v AW Baulderstone Pty Ltd (No 2) (1993) 47 FCR 388, cited. Forster v Farquhar [1893] 1 QB 564, cited. MAXWELL WILLIAM PRENTICE & ANOR (together the Trustees of the property of John Daniel Cummins, a Bankrupt) v MARY ELIZABETH CUMMINS & ORS N 7481 of 2001 SACKVILLE J SYDNEY 24 OCTOBER 2003
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 7481 OF 2001
BETWEEN: MAXWELL WILLIAM PRENTICE
FIRST APPLICANT
MARK JULIAN ROBINSON
SECOND APPLICANT
(together the Trustees of the Property of John Daniel Cummins, a Bankrupt)
AND: MARY ELIZABETH CUMMINS
SECOND RESPONDENT
AYMCOPIC PTY LIMITED
THIRD RESPONDENT
HOSPITALITY HIRE PTY LIMITED
FOURTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: SACKVILLE J
DATE OF ORDER: 24 OCTOBER 2003
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT DECLARES THAT:
1. The transfer made by the Bankrupt (John Daniel Cummins) of his legal and beneficial interest as joint tenant in the property at 77 Alexander Street Hunters Hill (the "Hunters Hill Property") to the second respondent on or about 26 August 1987 is void as against the applicants pursuant to s 121 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). 2. The transfer of the shares in Counsel's Chambers Ltd (the "Shares") made by the Bankrupt to the third respondent on or about 26 August 1987 is void as against the applicants pursuant to s 121 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate