Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Liu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1170 IMMIGRATION - student visa - visa cancellation - condition 8202 - whether error of law - privative clause decision Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 116 Migration Legislation Amendment (Overseas Students) Act 2000 (Cth) Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 (Cth)
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Nguyen [2002] FCA 460 cited Gerhard v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 495 cited Shrestha v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (No 1) [2001] FCA 359 cited Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 195 ALR 24 applied GUANGYAO LIU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS Q52 OF 2003 COOPER J BRISBANE 24 OCTOBER 2003
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q52 OF 2003
BETWEEN: GUANGYAO LIU
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: COOPER
DATE OF ORDER: 24 OCTOBER 2003
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application is dismissed.
2. The applicant to pay the respondent's costs to be taxed if not agreed.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q52 OF 2003
BETWEEN: GUANGYAO LIU
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: COOPER
DATE: 24 OCTOBER 2003
PLACE: BRISBANE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
BACKGROUND 1 The applicant is a national of The Peoples Republic of China. On 6 March 2001, the applicant received a Student (Temporary) Class TU visa. The visa was granted to the applicant on the basis that he was to study for a Bachelor of International Business degree at Bond University in Queensland. Attached to the visa was a condition 8202. The visa was due to expire on 15 May 2003. 2 On 27 June 2002, a delegate of the Minister cancelled the applicant's visa for non-compliance with condition 8202. The Migration Review Tribunal ('the MRT') affirmed the decision of the delegate to cancel the visa. The applicant applies to this Court under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) for the issue of prerogative writs to quash the decision of the MRT and requiring it to re-hear the application according to law.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate