Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Construction Forestry Mining & Energy Union v Queensland Coal and Oil Shale Mining Industry (Superannuation) Ltd [2003] FCA 1174
COSTS – Whether any costs order should be made – Unsuccessful application in relation to important and difficult legislation affecting many people – Position of successful respondents who were joined in the proceeding at their own request – Position of Commissioner of Taxation who was joined by the applicants in order to bind him to the decision in the proceeding. Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) [2001] FCA 1865; 115 FCR 229 applied. CONSTRUCTION FORESTRY MINING & ENERGY UNION & ORS v QUEENSLAND COAL AND OIL SHALE MINING INDUSTRY (SUPERANNUATION) LIMITED & ORS N 745 of 2002 WILCOX J 24 OCTOBER 2003 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N745 of 2002
BETWEEN: CONSTRUCTION FORESTRY MINING & ENERGY UNION
FIRST APPLICANT
DAVID POWER
SECOND APPLICANT
PETER MACPHERSON
THIRD APPLICANT
MARK NICKALLS
FOURTH APPLICANT
GLENN SKINNER
FIFTH APPLICANT
BERNHARD DEIMEL
SIXTH APPLICANT
NEVILLE WHITE
SEVENTH APPLICANT
BARRY BROMBEY
EIGHTH APPLICANT
BOB THOMAS
NINTH APPLICANT
JOHN HUNTER
TENTH APPLICANT
DOUG FRASER
ELEVENTH APPLICANT
LEE WEBB
TWELFTH APPLICANT
SHANE THOMPSON
THIRTEENTH APPLICANT
TREVOR BRIGNULL
FOURTEENTH APPLICANT
PETER TAYLOR
FIFTEENTH APPLICANT
TONY SHAW
SIXTEENTH APPLICANT
TREVOR SCHRAM
SEVENTEENTH APPLICANT
GRAEME OSBORNE
EIGHTEENTH APPLICANT
GREG SHARP
NINETEENTH APPLICANT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate