FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Applicant S254 of 2002 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2003] FCA 1197 APPLICANT S254 OF 2002 v REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL & ANOR N262 OF 2003 EMMETT J 6 JUNE 2003 SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N262 OF 2003 BETWEEN: APPLICANT S254 OF 2002 APPLICANT AND: REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL FIRST RESPONDENT MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS SECOND RESPONDENT JUDGE: EMMETT J DATE OF ORDER: 6 JUNE 2003 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. the application be dismissed pursuant to O 10 r 3(2) of the Federal Court Rules; 2. the applicant pay the second respondent's costs; 3. the second respondent notify the applicant at his last known address of these Orders and the terms of O 35 r 7(2)(a) of the Federal Court Rules. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N262 OF 2003 BETWEEN: APPLICANT S254 OF 2002 APPLICANT AND: REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL FIRST RESPONDENT MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS SECOND RESPONDENT JUDGE: EMMETT J DATE: 6 JUNE 2003 PLACE: SYDNEY REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This matter was commenced in the High Court of Australia and remitted to this Court by order of Gaudron J on 6 February 2003. At that stage, the applicant was represented by Adrian Joel & Co, solicitors, who filed notice of withdrawal of solicitor and affidavit in support on 24 April 2003. The solicitor's affidavit discloses that the last address that the applicant known to the solicitor is 33 Foreshaw Avenue, Griffith, New South Wales. On 28 April 2003 the solicitor for the second respondent, the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs ('the Minister'), was informed by an officer of the Minister's Department that the most recent address held by the department for the applicant was 6/61 Canal Street, Griffith, New South Wales. 2 The matter came before me for directions on 2 May 2003 when there was no appearance for the applicant. On 9 May 2003, I stood the matter over for directions today. On 20 May 2003, the Minister's solicitor wrote to the applicant at the two addresses to which I have referred, notifying the applicant of the directions hearing fixed for today and the need for representation on his behalf. The solicitor for the Minister informs me that those letters have recently been returned undelivered. When the matter was called today, there was no appearance for the applicant today. The Minister therefore asks for an order for summary dismissal of the proceeding pursuant to O 10 r 3(2) of the Federal Court Rules. 3 In the circumstances, it appears to me to be appropriate to make such an order. I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Emmett. Associate: Dated: 29 October 2003 Counsel for the Applicant: No appearance Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor Date of Hearing: 6 June 2003 Date of Judgment: 6 June 2003